The Odyssey

⚠️ Warning: This review contains major spoilers. If you haven’t watched the film yet, I’d recommend coming back after you have. It’s a journey worth taking with fresh eyes.

There are films you watch.

And then there are films you experience.

Last night I travelled all the way from my home to Thane because the film came highly recommended by someone whose opinion on mythology I respect immensely. I couldn’t find tickets anywhere in my area or rather on this side of the city. Honestly it completely slipped my mind that the movie was releasing today. I remembered Spider-Man was because of all the trailers that kept showing up everywhere. Yet something told me I had to watch this one this weekend.

I’m glad I listened.

For someone who has studied Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey, I walked in wondering what Christopher Nolan would discard, what he would compress and what he would reinvent. I walked out surprisingly satisfied. I genuinely cannot think of a single major episode from the epic that I desperately missed. That, in itself, is remarkable.

Matt Damon is magnificent. He never plays Odysseus as an untouchable hero. He gives us a man worn down by war, by pride, by guilt and by the unbearable weight of survival. His Odysseus is at once cunning, vulnerable and quietly broken.

Tom Holland, unfortunately, never quite convinced me. He isn’t bad at all, but he felt miscast. Telemachus should still carry the uncertainty of youth, someone only just becoming a man. Holland, for me, looked and felt a little too mature for the role, making that coming-of-age journey less affecting than it should have been.

Anne Hathaway’s finest moment comes when Telemachus, exhausted by two decades of uncertainty, asks his mother to stop waiting and finally choose one of the suitors. It is an impossible conversation between a son desperate to save his kingdom and a mother whose hope has become an act of defiance. Hathaway plays the scene with astonishing restraint. She is bereft, and every glance carries twenty years of longing, loneliness and unwavering faith. It is one of the finest performances in the film.

John Leguizamo’s Eumaeus was another revelation. His loyalty hurt to watch. Here is a servant who never stopped believing. Twenty years of waiting. Twenty years of tending the estate. Twenty years of caring for the hunting hounds because someone had to believe Odysseus would eventually return. He was the personification of a dog’s loyalty. 

One scene has remained with me ever since I left the cinema. Eumaeus is killing puppies that are unlikely to grow into good hunting dogs. It is harsh, but entirely in keeping with the brutal realities of the ancient world. Then Odysseus quietly intervenes and saves one of those doomed pups.

That puppy is Argos.

Which makes their reunion twenty years later almost unbearable. Argos wasn’t simply an old dog recognising his master. He was a life Odysseus himself had once saved. The loyalty had come full circle. I knew exactly what was coming, and it still broke me. Homer wrote one of literature’s greatest scenes, and Nolan honours it beautifully by giving it an even deeper emotional foundation.

The Cyclops sequence is spectacular. Polyphemus feels ancient, terrifying and utterly believable. The scale is immense without becoming cartoonish. Yet what stayed with me even more than the monster was what followed.

Odysseus cannot resist engaging in revenge. His pride—his fatal hubris—demands recognition. That single moment condemns him and every man sailing beside him. The grey area of who truly is a monster is riveting. 

By the end of the story he has learnt the hardest lesson of all: sometimes survival belongs not to the greatest hero, but to the man willing to hide his own greatness. Had he not finally buried his ego beneath the disguise of a beggar, he would never have reclaimed Ithaca. The arrogance that doomed him before ultimately gives way to humility, and that is the true victory of his journey.

That is perhaps why The Odyssey remains painfully relevant today.

It is not really about monsters.

It is about war.

About men intoxicated by vengeance.

About the destruction pride leaves behind long after the battlefield has emptied.

One of Nolan’s smartest choices is how he treats the gods.

Zendaya is unmistakably Athena, but she rarely feels like a goddess striding down from Olympus. Instead, she seems to embody Odysseus’ wisdom, conscience and instinct. She appears whenever he is in danger of losing himself, almost as though Athena exists both as a goddess and as the voice that guides him from within. That makes her the only Olympian with a sustained human presence.

The male gods, by contrast, become elemental forces. Poseidon is the sea itself. Divine anger arrives through storms, waves and nature rather than men descending from the heavens. It is an elegant way of preserving the mythology while keeping the story rooted in human experience.

Interestingly, Nolan ensures that the women of the epic retain their full presence.

Penelope.

Athena.

Circe.

Calypso.

The Sirens.

Helen.

Clytemnestra.

The women shape the narrative, while the male gods are largely transformed into the world around them.

Circe, in particular, is magnificent. Of all the women in The Odyssey, Samantha Morton’s Circe left the deepest impression on me. Despite her relatively brief screen time, she completely stole the film. Her performance is visceral, vibrant and seething with barely contained rage, yet alive with an intoxicating zest and verve. She embodies the witch with terrifying authority, commanding every frame she inhabits, while never losing sight of the loneliness and aching pathos beneath the power. It is a breathtaking balancing act that makes Circe feel both mythic and profoundly human. Perhaps the highest compliment came from Christopher Nolan and producer Emma Thomas, who revealed that Morton’s scene earned a spontaneous standing ovation from the cast and crew—“the first such reaction on a Nolan set since Heath Ledger’s performance in The Dark Knight. Watching her, it’s easy to understand why.”

Her speech exposing the true nature of men may be my favourite dialogue in the entire film.

“Turn back into your disguise as men.”

What a devastating line.

But it is everything surrounding that scene that stayed with me.

Circe has lived alone for years. Suddenly, a ship full of armed strangers lands on her island. We, the audience, know they are Odysseus’ men. She doesn’t. From her perspective, every ship could bring men who want to conquer, plunder, rape or kill. It reminded me of the conversations we still have today whenever someone says, “Not all men.” Of course “not all men”. But women like Circe have never had the luxury of knowing which men are safe until it is too late. Like all women. 

Then she strips away every heroic illusion. Men, she says in essence, all want the same things. They want to eat. They want to be fed. They want someone to keep house for them. They want sex. The transformation into swine is brilliant because it isn’t really about magic at all. It is about exposing appetites we spend our lives pretending are more sophisticated than they really are.

Ironically, that was the very first scene that came back to me when I got home after the film.

I’d made the long journey back from Thane. I walked through my front door absolutely starving. All I wanted was food and the comfort of home. I actually laughed to myself because Circe’s words echoed in my head. Strip away our ambitions, our careers, our philosophies, and perhaps she was right. Sometimes we really are just creatures longing to be fed and to find our way home.

I was less convinced by the Laestrygonians.

Turning them into towering medieval armoured giants certainly creates memorable imagery, but I missed Homer’s original vision of colossal beings hurling boulders upon the Greek fleet. Sometimes the ancient imagination is already cinematic enough.

Likewise, merging Calypso with the Lotus-Eaters is a liberty I understand, even if I didn’t entirely like it. For cinema it streamlines the narrative. For readers of Homer, however, the two represent entirely different temptations. The Lotus-Eaters offer forgetfulness. Calypso offers immortality and eternal comfort. They serve different purposes, and I missed that distinction.

The climax, thankfully, is never rushed.

Too many adaptations hurry once the hero reaches home.

Nolan does the opposite.

The rescue of Telemachus.

The reunion with Argos.

The reclaiming of the palace.

The death of the loathsome Antinous.

Every moment is allowed to breathe. Yes, Homer has Antinous as the very first suitor to die, but changing the order serves the rhythm of the film without diminishing the satisfaction of justice finally arriving.

The film also handles Agamemnon with remarkable presence.

His aura is so commanding that, for a moment, I almost mistook him for Ares—or even Achilles returned from the dead. Yet what fascinated me more was the tragedy surrounding his family. Agamemnon sacrifices his daughter for victory. His presence on the battlefield signifies complete ego. He overshadows everyone there. Anticlimactically, Clytemnestra murders him in his own home in revenge. 

Orestes then kills his own mother to avenge his father. Three thousand years later, that story still resonates because it asks who ultimately pays the price for men’s wars. More often than not, it is women.

Which is why one liberty genuinely bothered me: Helen and Clytemnestra are presented as identical. They were not. They were half-sisters.

That distinction matters. Helen’s legendary beauty was singular. It launched a thousand ships and became the spark for the greatest war of the ancient world. Making her visually identical to Clytemnestra may simplify casting, but it diminishes something essential about the mythology. Some liberties are worth taking. This wasn’t one of them.

The music deserves special praise. It is extraordinary. Not conventionally beautiful, but elemental. It feels less like a score and more like something unearthed from the Bronze Age itself. During the Sack of Troy it pounds with the relentless machinery of war. During Circe’s transformation of men into swine it abandons melody for something ritualistic and deeply unsettling. It doesn’t merely accompany the story; it feels like the pulse of myth itself.

One aspect that deserves special mention is Nolan’s decision to shoot The Odyssey entirely on analogue IMAX 70mm film, making it the first feature in history to do so. In an era dominated by pristine digital cinematography, the image possesses a warmth, softness and organic texture that feels almost otherworldly. The grain breathes, the light glows and every frame carries the tactile beauty of something physical rather than manufactured. It lends the film an ancient, timeless quality—as though we are witnessing a myth remembered rather than a story recreated. It is deeply unfortunate that only a handful of IMAX 70mm cinemas worldwide can present the film in its full 1.43:1 glory, because this is not merely a technical achievement; it is an artistic one.

I absolutely revelled in this film. Christopher Nolan has not merely adapted Homer. He has understood him. He understands that The Odyssey is not ultimately about monsters, magic or even gods.

It is about what war does to people.

About the terrible cost of pride.

About vengeance consuming generations.

About the wisdom that only suffering can teach.

Odysseus begins the story desperate to be remembered as the greatest hero alive. He ends it willing to hide his name, bury his pride and walk home as a beggar if that is what it takes to reclaim his family and his kingdom.

That is the journey.

That is why Homer’s epic has survived for nearly three thousand years.

And that is why Nolan’s film feels so profoundly relevant today.

In an age still consumed by wars, wounded egos and men who mistake pride for strength, The Odyssey reminds us that the greatest victories are not won on battlefields.

They are won over ourselves.

The Devil Wears Prada 2

Walking into The Devil Wears Prada 2, I’ll admit—I had expectations. I shouldn’t have. Sequels, especially to something as sharp and iconic as the original, rarely rise to the occasion.

This one doesn’t even try hard enough.

The film brings back Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly, Anne Hathaway as Andrea Sachs, and Emily Blunt as Emily Charlton—but somewhere along the way, it forgets what made these characters electric in the first place.

What we get instead is a strangely sanitised version of a world that was once cutting, ruthless, and deliciously intimidating.

The bite is gone.

There are no truly sharp observations about fashion, power, or ambition. The iconic one-liners that defined the original film are largely missing—and the few that do land are handed almost entirely to Emily Blunt. She is, quite frankly, the only one who feels alive in this film. She carries the same acerbic energy, the same hunger—and ironically, she ends up framed as a kind of “villain vendor,” which feels both reductive and oddly misplaced. If anything, she feels like the natural successor to Miranda’s throne.

And you can’t help but think: why isn’t she in Andrea’s position?

The film leans heavily into aesthetics—yes, the clothes are stunning. Milan looks gorgeous. Fashion, visually, is still doing its job. But storytelling? That’s where it falters. The narrative feels flat, almost indifferent. The industry that once pulsed with ambition and ego now feels muted, like it’s been softened for comfort.

There’s a sense that as the magazine world fades into digital, the film itself loses its edge—as if human brilliance has been replaced with something safer, more forgettable.

The grit is missing.
The passion is missing.
The chutzpah is missing.

Two moments stand out:

One was Miranda’s conversation with Irv’s son—the voice of a new generation that, much like Timothée Chalamet, seems to believe that opera and ballet are dying art forms. There’s something deeply sad, almost tragic, about that idea. The suggestion that digital media can replace the tactile, emotional experience of magazines feels equally hollow. I still can’t bring myself to read a book on a screen—it lacks soul.

Yes, there are valid concerns about paper, sustainability, and the environment. But what unsettles me more is how quickly we are allowing digitalisation to replace real, human effort. As an editor, I feel this personally—AI is no longer a distant threat; it is already here, already capable of doing what I do.

The film touches on this anxiety, and I appreciated that it acknowledged the shift. But what frustrated me was that Miranda—who has always embodied authority, intelligence, and control—has no real comeback. No defence. No articulation of why craft, legacy, and human curation still matter.

And that silence feels like a loss.

The second moment is Miranda’s monologue referencing The Last Supper, where she speaks to Andrea about betrayal. It briefly rekindles the old magic—a reminder of what this film could have been. But it’s fleeting.

And that’s the tragedy here.

Even Miranda, once the embodiment of intimidating perfection, feels… toned down. As she herself might say—this isn’t New York anymore.

It’s New Jersey.

I dressed for the occasion, fully stepping into the world this film once celebrated. But walking out, I realised something uncomfortable:

I didn’t like it very much.

It’s not a terrible film. It’s just… disappointing. A glossy shell without the soul that made the original unforgettable.

And perhaps that’s the most unfashionable thing of all.

Michael

When a Film Becomes Memory, Music, and Something Personal

There are films you watch.

And then there are films that take you somewhere you didn’t expect to go.

Michael did that to me tonight.

I walked into a near-empty auditorium for a midnight preview—barely ten of us scattered across seats—and yet, from the very first beat of “Wanna Be Startin’ Somethin’”, I wasn’t in that theatre anymore.

I was a child again.

The First Time I Met Michael

My earliest memory of Michael Jackson isn’t from a concert or a cassette—it was from television. Someone else’s house. Early 1980s. The first time I ever saw MTV.

And there he was.

Thriller.

I didn’t have the language for what I was seeing, but I knew I was witnessing something… otherworldly. Something that didn’t belong to just music—it belonged to movement, to imagination, to rhythm that travelled straight into your bones.

As I grew up, his music grew with me—

Beat It,

Bad,

Smooth Criminal,

Billie Jean,

and so many more.

And then, in college, I began to understand the man behind the music.

We Are the World wasn’t just a song.

Heal the World wasn’t just melody.

Earth Song and

They Don’t Care About Us weren’t just performances.

They were statements.

He wasn’t just entertaining us—he was speaking to us.

The Film: A Performance Recreated, Almost Too Perfectly

Walking into Michael, I had one hope—that it would do justice to someone who didn’t just define pop culture, but reshaped it.

And surprisingly, it does.

Jaafar Jackson—his own nephew—steps into the role with a kind of precision that is almost unsettling. The voice, the pauses, the body language, the stillness before movement—it’s all there.

At moments, it doesn’t feel like imitation.

It feels like invocation.

The recreations of iconic performances—Thriller, Beat It, his early Grammy stage, the London performances of Bad—are electric. Even in a nearly empty theatre, the energy felt full. Charged.

And yet, I couldn’t help but feel a quiet sadness.

How is a story like this… not filling seats?

How did we forget what global cultural history looks like when it stands right in front of it?

The Parts That Stayed With Me

There were moments I didn’t expect to be affected by.

One of them was the infamous Pepsi commercial accident—the burns, the pain, the shock. I had heard about it before, but the film brings you uncomfortably close to it. Close enough to feel the fragility behind the myth.

But what truly stayed with me was something far more personal.

His childhood.

His father.

The abuse.

There’s a moment where he asks others—lawyers, executives—to speak to his father on his behalf. And I understood that immediately.

Because I’ve lived that.

When you grow up with fear, with authority that crushes rather than guides, you don’t always find your voice directly. Sometimes, you borrow someone else’s.

Watching that wasn’t just watching Michael.

It was watching a version of myself I’ve known too well.

The Mother, The Apology… and What It Opened in Me

There is a scene where his mother says something I have never heard in my own life:

“I’m sorry I couldn’t protect you.”

And in that moment, something shifted inside me.

Because I realised—that absence of apology leaves a mark.

A quiet, persistent fracture.

It made me confront something I still carry. Not anger alone, but the weight of something that was never acknowledged.

This is what powerful cinema does.

It doesn’t just tell a story.

It reveals your own.

The Man Behind the Myth

The film also leans heavily into Michael’s gentleness—his love for animals, his childlike wonder, the softness that existed alongside his genius. His closeness to Barrie’s Peter Pan and the idea of Neverland. Guess what I have tattooed on my left arm. Tinker bell and Peter Pan soaring through the sky in silhouette.

At times, it feels almost too kind. Almost protective. There’s a noticeable absence of anything that might complicate his image.

Is it whitewashing?

Perhaps.

But it also raises a question—what if this was him, at his core?

And if it was, then the world didn’t just lose an artist.

It lost something far rarer.

Direction, Rhythm, and Restraint

From a filmmaking perspective, Michael understands balance.

It doesn’t drown you in music, nor does it strip it away. It moves between performance and personal life with a rhythm that feels intentional. The edits are sharp, the pacing controlled, and the emotional beats are given just enough space to land.

And importantly—it knows when to stop.

The film ends with his London performances, with a quiet suggestion:

His story continues.

And I hope it does.

Because there is so much more left to explore.

Final Thoughts

I walked into the theatre expecting a biopic.

I walked out having revisited my childhood, my relationship with music, and parts of myself I usually sit with.

Michael isn’t perfect.

But it is sincere.

It is immersive.

And at times, deeply, unexpectedly personal.

And perhaps the saddest part of the night wasn’t anything in the film—

It was how few people were there to witness it.