On Looking Down, and Looking In

I met someone recently—someone I’d spoken to online—at a party I attended not long ago. In person, though, something felt immediately off. Not because of chemistry or the lack of it, but because of an almost compulsive need he seemed to have: to look down on everything around him.

The party wasn’t good enough.

The music wasn’t up to the mark.

The people weren’t interesting enough.

Nothing passed muster. Everything required commentary, and all of it was dismissive.

He told me he was 22. And instinctively, I wondered if this was an age thing. But then I stopped myself. I was once that age too. I don’t remember needing to belittle an entire room to feel significant within it.

What unsettled me more was the familiarity of it. I’ve encountered this posture before—among people I’ve known, been friends with, sometimes even admired at one point. A certain self-appointed elite, defined not by kindness or depth, but by what and whom they reject. How others dress. How they speak. What music they like. Where they come from. Everything becomes a metric for exclusion.

I’m not pretending I’m immune to prejudice. I’m not. I know exactly where mine lies.

I don’t tend to judge people by caste, class, race, or colour. But I do judge—quietly, perhaps arrogantly—on intellectual and emotional grounds. Empathy matters deeply to me. Curiosity matters. The ability to question inherited beliefs matters. And yes, I struggle with people who are blinded by unexamined faith or rigid dogma. That is my bias. I own it.

So the uncomfortable question arose: was I doing something similar to him, just dressed in better language?

I don’t think it’s the same. Or at least, I hope it isn’t.

Because there is a difference between choosing not to engage, and actively deriding. Between recognising incompatibility, and making contempt a personality trait. What I witnessed wasn’t discernment—it was dismissal masquerading as sophistication.

There’s something deeply sad about believing that to appear intelligent, dapper, or “above it all,” one must constantly signal what one is not. That one must shrink others to inflate oneself. It’s a brittle kind of confidence, and it cracks easily.

Perhaps age does play a role. At 22, there is often a frantic need to impress—by saying the right things, having the right opinions, aligning oneself with the “correct” tastes. Sometimes that performance hardens into habit. Sometimes it softens with time. I don’t know which way it will go for him.

What I do know is this: I don’t need to pull anyone down to feel whole. I don’t need to sneer at a room to belong in it. If I don’t resonate, I can simply step away—with grace.

We live in a world already cruel enough, stratified enough, lonely enough. Choosing empathy over elitism isn’t naïveté; it’s resistance.

And perhaps the real marker of maturity—emotional, intellectual, human—is not how sharply we judge, but how gently we hold our differences.

A psychological self-portrait

I have lived a life where the past never entirely stays in the past. Trauma leaves fingerprints on everything — how I write, how I love, how I choose, how I walk through the world. My therapist calls it PTSD and anxiety, but in daily life it shows up in ways far more subtle, intricate, and intimate.

This is an attempt to describe it as honestly as I can.

1. How Trauma Shows Up in My Writing Style

My writing has always been my bloodstream. When trauma lives inside you for years, it eventually finds its vocabulary.

It appears in my work through:

• Intensity

I write with emotional force because I feel with emotional force. Even ordinary memories drop with the weight of history.

• Spirals of thought

I return to themes — abandonment, love, loss, cruelty, tenderness — because trauma teaches the mind to circle, revisit, re-examine.

• Sudden shifts in mood

A paragraph may hold beauty and pain side by side. That juxtaposition is simply how my memory functions.

• Hyper-observation

Trauma survivors see everything. We read micro-gestures, silences, weather, light, breathing. My writing reflects that heightened perception.

• A need for meaning

Suffering without meaning feels unbearable. So I create meaning — through metaphor, philosophy, and emotional clarity.

My writing is not broken. It’s marked. It carries the fingerprints of a boy who had to understand the world too early and too deeply.

2. How PTSD Affects My Relationships

People think PTSD is about flashbacks or trembling hands. But the most profound effects are relational.

For me, it looks like:

• Hyper-vigilance

I anticipate hurt before it happens. I prepare for abandonment even in stable relationships. It doesn’t mean I distrust others — it means I’ve been taught not to trust safety.

• Deep loyalty

When I love, I love completely. Trauma often creates intensity — not chaos, but depth.

• Emotional self-protection

Even with people I adore, a part of me stays on guard. I reveal slowly, painfully, carefully. And when I finally trust, the bond is absolute.

• Taking the “strong” role

I become the caretaker, the organiser, the one who absorbs the emotional weather of others. It’s how I learnt to survive.

• Fear of burdening others

I carry most of my pain internally, not because I want to, but because I learnt early that expressing needs can be dangerous.

PTSD in relationships is not a deficit — it is history. And history always travels with us.

3. How Anxiety Shapes My Decision-Making

My decisions are logical, but the emotional engine underneath is shaped by anxiety.

It shows up as:

• Over-analysis

I examine every possibility because uncertainty once meant danger.

• The need for control

Trauma steals control. Anxiety tries to reclaim it.

• Quick, practical responses in crisis

I stabilise first, collapse later. This is why I can handle diagnoses, emergencies, and grief with an eerie calm.

• Strong intuition

Anxiety sharpens instinct. I read people accurately because I had to.

• Difficulty trusting the future

Not because I’m pessimistic — but because childhood taught me that comfort can vanish overnight.

My decisions are careful, considered, shaped by survival, but never ruled by fear. That distinction matters.

4. A Psychological Profile I Can Share With the World

This is who I am, in the simplest truthful terms:

I am a trauma survivor who carries old wounds with extraordinary resilience.

I feel deeply, think intensely, love fiercely, and endure silently until the breaking point.

I read the world with a heightened sensitivity, shaped by danger but used now for compassion.

I have PTSD and anxiety — but I also have clarity, creativity, strength, depth, and a capacity for love that is larger than the pain that made me.

My mind is not fragile; it is weathered. My heart is not weak; it is scarred and brave.

I do not write from brokenness. I write from survival. I write from life.

Fool Me

The darkness – I had thought – was spent!
But fool me, fool me, it returns!
The cold seeps so deep in my bones,
Forming a crackling pyre – it burns!

Disillusionment derides hope;
The cold wasn’t something to defeat…
Life burgeons in its anguish,
I can’t run and I can’t retreat.

So I walk. Look around and see.
What I’ve left, what is left to me.
I use the light breaking my bones;
I pay full price, I have no loans.

I dance with broken knees, making this light;
Till I burn, I defeat this endless night.