Peter

I have Peter Pan tattooed on my arm. Let me tell you why he means so much to me, and what he really stands for — not just in stories, but in the way writers and thinkers understand childhood itself.

When I was young, I didn’t get the soft, safe childhood that many children do. Life pushed me to grow up quickly, to understand things too early, and to protect myself in ways a child shouldn’t have to. But somewhere inside me, there was still a tiny spark that refused to die — a spark of imagination, wonder, humour, hope. That little spark kept me alive, and in many ways, Peter Pan represents that part of me.

Most people think Peter Pan is just a boy who refuses to grow up. But his name comes from the ancient Greek god Pan — the wild spirit of nature.

Pan wasn’t gentle or civilised. He was half-human, half-goat, with horns, hooves, and an erect phallus, which represented nature’s raw life-force. He was joyful and frightening, beautiful and wild, playful and powerful. He stood for the part of the world that adults try to tame but never truly can.

E. M. Forster wrote a story called The Story of a Panic, where Pan appears not as a monster but as a force of pure, natural joy. The adults in the story are terrified of him because they’ve forgotten what it feels like to be free. But the boy who feels Pan’s presence becomes alive in a way the grown-ups can’t understand.

Peter Pan is exactly that kind of spirit.

He is childhood in its raw, untamed form — full of imagination, wildness, fearlessness, and joy. The kind of childhood that today’s world has almost forgotten.

And that brings me to another writer: William Blake.

Blake wrote two famous collections of poems — Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience.

In the Songs of Innocence, he spoke about childhood as a sacred, magical time — a world full of wonder, trust, and imagination.

In the Songs of Experience, he showed how the world crushes that innocence — with fear, cruelty, knowledge that comes too early, and responsibilities a child shouldn’t carry.

Even in Blake’s time, adults worried that children were losing innocence too quickly.

Today, it’s even worse. Children know everything too soon — violence, death, betrayals, cruelty, adult worries long before they’re ready. There’s no time to dream. No time to play. No time to believe in magic.

And that is why Peter Pan matters to me.

Peter represents the child inside us who refuses to let the world take away its light.

He stands for the part of the human spirit Blake called “innocence” — not naïve, not foolish, but open-hearted and imaginative. The part that trusts, loves, laughs, and sees beauty.

In today’s world, people sometimes say Peter Pan is selfish or uncaring. They judge him by adult standards. They make Hook the hero and turn Peter into the villain. But that’s not how J. M. Barrie wrote him. Barrie loved Peter because Peter lived outside time, outside rules, outside the heaviness of adulthood. He wasn’t meant to behave like a grown-up — he was meant to represent the one thing adults can’t fully control: the spirit of childhood.

Peter forgets not because he is cruel, but because he lives in the eternal now.

He doesn’t understand time because no one ever protected him long enough to teach him.

He isn’t irresponsible — he is free.

And freedom, real freedom, scares adults who have forgotten how to dream.

That’s why I don’t agree with people who villainise Peter today. They see him from the perspective of experience, but forget the value of innocence.

Peter Pan is not a warning about immaturity.

He’s a reminder that even when life is difficult, we must protect the small, bright, imaginative part of ourselves.

The part that still believes in flying.

The part that still wants to explore forests and seas.

The part that hasn’t given up.

So when you see this tattoo, know that it isn’t about refusing to be an adult.

It’s about holding on to wonder.

Holding on to joy.

Holding on to innocence in a world that tries to steal it too fast.

It’s about remembering that the wild spark inside us — like Pan, like Peter, like Blake’s innocent child — deserves to live.

And that spark is what kept me alive.

My Mother

When I think of my mother, I think of a woman who has lived through contradictions — a woman shaped by her own wounds, her own courage, and her own choices. She is not perfect, and neither is our story, but she has been the one constant structure in my life: the person who, in her own distinct way, always had my back.

I came out to her when I was sixteen, sometime around 1992. I still remember the moment clearly — she was cooking, and I had already spent weeks preparing the ground by talking about a boy I had a crush on. When I finally said the words, she didn’t react dramatically. She didn’t lecture me, she didn’t throw a fit, she didn’t even say she “supported” me. She simply carried on, taking it in without protest. In 1992, that silence was its own kind of acceptance. She let me be who I was, without shaming me or pushing me into hiding. That, in itself, was a gift.

Her life was shaped by choices that separated her from her own family. She married my father because he pursued her persistently, and by twenty-two she was a wife and, not long after, a mother. She never fit neatly into the expectations of her Parsi community, and when she married outside it, she was sidelined, pushed out, made the “other”. In that isolation, she learnt to depend on herself. She built a life from scratch, took a 9–5 job in a bank, and became the sole provider for two children. She did this in an environment where her beauty and intelligence didn’t translate into privilege or help. She simply worked because she had to.

My sister and I grew up mostly in the care of my grandmother, my aunts, and my nanny. They were the ones who held me close, and my mother often says they preferred me because they were patriarchal and misogynistic. Over the years, this made her feel pushed aside, as though I had chosen them over her. It’s a complicated emotional knot — her resentment, my affection for them, and the way old family dynamics shaped our closeness. None of it is simple, yet all of it is true.

She has always had strong ideas about right and wrong, shaped partly by being a middle child who felt overlooked, and partly by the life she built out of necessity. She could be strict to the point of being harsh. When I struggled with maths as a child, she would teach me at home after school, and when I couldn’t grasp it, I would get beaten. My first panic attack happened in the fifth standard, holding a maths paper with a score of 12 out of 50, terrified to show her. My aunt had to intervene. After that, I was put into tuitions year after year. Fear became a language between us for a long time.

When she finally left my father and moved into the home she built on her own, she pulled us away from the warmth and affection that my grandmother and aunts had given me. I don’t think she thought through what that would mean for us emotionally — she simply made the move she needed to make.

What followed for me was a childhood that began to cave in from multiple sides. After we shifted, I was being bullied and beaten by my father at home. At the same time, I was being bullied in school — mocked for being effeminate, harassed, and made to feel unsafe. I tried to explain to her that something was happening in school, that I didn’t feel right in that environment, that I dreaded returning there. One morning, walking down the stairs on the way to school, I collapsed. A neighbour found me and carried me home.

When my maternal grandparents arrived, my grandfather dismissed the incident completely and said I was pretending so I wouldn’t have to go to school. My mother didn’t question that opinion. She didn’t ask what was happening to me, didn’t explore the reason behind my dread. She did, eventually, shift me to another school — a convent school closer to what I had known earlier — but the pattern repeated. I was still bullied. I became the fat, effeminate boy who was an easy target. Even my first crush in that school humiliated me at our farewell party.

I had no one to talk to about any of this. Not my sister, not my mother, not my grandmother who was far away, and certainly not my father. My childhood became a long, silent boil — painful, unbroken, and festering. By twelve, I knew I was gay, and I searched desperately for any gay cinema I could find, looking for some sense of reflection. When I came out to my mother, I honestly believed she might ask me to leave. A part of me would have preferred going back to live with my grandmother. So it surprised me when she took it in her stride. She didn’t react with anger or fear. She simply absorbed it. Even today, there are many aspects of being gay that she doesn’t fully understand. She can be quick to judge. But she accepted the truth of who I was, and she allowed me to exist without hate.

When my father and extended family tried to reconcile, they arrived with a VCR because they knew how much I loved films. She still says they used my love for movies to manipulate their way back into our home, and she partly blames me for that reconciliation. It is strange to carry responsibility for something like that as a child, but again, this is part of her way of interpreting the world.

As I grew older, another layer revealed itself — her jealousy. She has carried jealousy from childhood, from watching her parents favour her sister. And at times, that feeling has extended to me. She has told me more than once that I was loved because I was a boy, and she has, in those moments, ignored the fact that I was beaten, bullied, harassed, closeted, and terrified for most of my growing years. She sees my adult world through the lens of straight privilege and often disregards the realities of my sexuality, my heartbreaks, and the impossibility of marrying the man I love in the country we live in. She responds to emotion with action, and believes action alone solves all problems. She does not understand therapy, depression, or psychiatry. She is a grassroots person — she understands what she sees, and she struggles with what she cannot visualise.

What hurts me the most is that she often thinks I don’t understand her, when I believe I understand her better than anyone in the family. Yet she feels antipathy towards me, and the older we grow, the more resentment gathers between us. I have grown cold at times. I have grown short-tempered with her shortcomings. There is a distance growing between us that neither of us seems able to soften.

The rest of that chapter — my father’s violence, his homophobia — is already known. I won’t revisit it here. This is about her.

And the truth is this:

she was a woman who held up a collapsing world on her own shoulders.

She provided. She worked. She survived.

She marched in pride parades with me.

She stood beside me in moments when society could have crushed me.

She may not have always known how to nurture, but she always knew how to protect.

Yet the other truth stands beside it: I wish my childhood had been easier. I wish someone had listened. I wish the bullying, the fear, the harassment, and the loneliness had been recognised early enough to prevent the scars I still carry. I know there are countless people who face far worse, and I’m grateful I wasn’t harmed in those ways — but I refuse to guilt-trip myself out of acknowledging my own pain. I deserved better, and it is fair to say so.

Both my parents could have done more. Both could have understood more. Both could have protected more. The cost of those gaps shows up in the PTSD, the anxiety, and the emotional fractures I navigate even today.

But this, too, is part of the truth:

my mother did the best she could with what she had, with who she was, and with the limits of her own emotional inheritance.

I don’t see her as a saint, and I don’t see her as a villain. And perhaps this is the part that deserves to be said as well:

We are all flawed. Every one of us. My mother did what her conditioning allowed, shaped by the insecurities she carried and the fears she had never been taught to untangle. She parented from instinct, from circumstance, from survival. And in her own way, she provided. She kept my sister and me afloat. She helped shape the people we eventually became. 

But she wasn’t the only influence — my grandmother, my aunts, the women who held me when the world felt unbearable, they shaped me too. They softened the sharp edges. They gave me the warmth she sometimes couldn’t offer. Families are like that — quilted from many hands, stitched by many temperaments.

I often wish the world were a place where people were taught how to be good parents before they brought children into it. But these things aren’t taught, not really. I don’t even know if they can be. Parenting is a strange, uncharted terrain, navigated with whatever maps one inherits, whatever courage one can muster, and whatever love one is able — or unable — to give.

My mother did what she could with the map she had.

And so did I.

A psychological self-portrait

I have lived a life where the past never entirely stays in the past. Trauma leaves fingerprints on everything — how I write, how I love, how I choose, how I walk through the world. My therapist calls it PTSD and anxiety, but in daily life it shows up in ways far more subtle, intricate, and intimate.

This is an attempt to describe it as honestly as I can.

1. How Trauma Shows Up in My Writing Style

My writing has always been my bloodstream. When trauma lives inside you for years, it eventually finds its vocabulary.

It appears in my work through:

• Intensity

I write with emotional force because I feel with emotional force. Even ordinary memories drop with the weight of history.

• Spirals of thought

I return to themes — abandonment, love, loss, cruelty, tenderness — because trauma teaches the mind to circle, revisit, re-examine.

• Sudden shifts in mood

A paragraph may hold beauty and pain side by side. That juxtaposition is simply how my memory functions.

• Hyper-observation

Trauma survivors see everything. We read micro-gestures, silences, weather, light, breathing. My writing reflects that heightened perception.

• A need for meaning

Suffering without meaning feels unbearable. So I create meaning — through metaphor, philosophy, and emotional clarity.

My writing is not broken. It’s marked. It carries the fingerprints of a boy who had to understand the world too early and too deeply.

2. How PTSD Affects My Relationships

People think PTSD is about flashbacks or trembling hands. But the most profound effects are relational.

For me, it looks like:

• Hyper-vigilance

I anticipate hurt before it happens. I prepare for abandonment even in stable relationships. It doesn’t mean I distrust others — it means I’ve been taught not to trust safety.

• Deep loyalty

When I love, I love completely. Trauma often creates intensity — not chaos, but depth.

• Emotional self-protection

Even with people I adore, a part of me stays on guard. I reveal slowly, painfully, carefully. And when I finally trust, the bond is absolute.

• Taking the “strong” role

I become the caretaker, the organiser, the one who absorbs the emotional weather of others. It’s how I learnt to survive.

• Fear of burdening others

I carry most of my pain internally, not because I want to, but because I learnt early that expressing needs can be dangerous.

PTSD in relationships is not a deficit — it is history. And history always travels with us.

3. How Anxiety Shapes My Decision-Making

My decisions are logical, but the emotional engine underneath is shaped by anxiety.

It shows up as:

• Over-analysis

I examine every possibility because uncertainty once meant danger.

• The need for control

Trauma steals control. Anxiety tries to reclaim it.

• Quick, practical responses in crisis

I stabilise first, collapse later. This is why I can handle diagnoses, emergencies, and grief with an eerie calm.

• Strong intuition

Anxiety sharpens instinct. I read people accurately because I had to.

• Difficulty trusting the future

Not because I’m pessimistic — but because childhood taught me that comfort can vanish overnight.

My decisions are careful, considered, shaped by survival, but never ruled by fear. That distinction matters.

4. A Psychological Profile I Can Share With the World

This is who I am, in the simplest truthful terms:

I am a trauma survivor who carries old wounds with extraordinary resilience.

I feel deeply, think intensely, love fiercely, and endure silently until the breaking point.

I read the world with a heightened sensitivity, shaped by danger but used now for compassion.

I have PTSD and anxiety — but I also have clarity, creativity, strength, depth, and a capacity for love that is larger than the pain that made me.

My mind is not fragile; it is weathered. My heart is not weak; it is scarred and brave.

I do not write from brokenness. I write from survival. I write from life.