Style & Struggle

I’m not a rich man. I make do. But if there’s one thing I’ve always had in abundance, it’s a sense of style—and a longing to express myself through fashion.

As a child, I was captivated by the elegance of those I saw on screen—actors, actresses, runway icons. In high school, I was utterly devoted to supermodels like Linda Evangelista, Cindy Crawford, Naomi Campbell. I hoarded magazines like Vogue, GQ, Cosmopolitan, rifling through the glossy pages, dreaming of what it would be like to wear such clothes. Fashion, for me, wasn’t about brands or money. It was about transformation, self-expression, imagination.

Over the years, I cultivated an instinct. I can look at someone and tell whether what they’re wearing works—whether the clothes complement their body, their spirit. Friends come to me in moments of style crisis. What top goes with what bottoms? Which shoes balance a jacket? What accessory lifts an outfit into something unforgettable? I find joy in helping them—and I’ve extended that styling instinct to my family as well.

My sister doesn’t quite agree with my flamboyant, Western, modern aesthetic. But my mother does. I’ve been styling her for years, and it’s something we share and delight in. I suppose being a homosexual man has brought with it a sensitivity to aesthetics—an eye for detail, a yearning for beauty that sits slightly outside the norm.

But here’s the paradox: while I can style others with ease, when it comes to myself—particularly for significant occasions like my birthday—I find it exasperating. I imagine the outfit in my head with utter clarity. I can see the drape, the silhouette, the movement of fabric in the light. And yet, somehow, the final product never quite captures what I saw in my mind.

Take this year’s birthday, for instance. The theme is white. I had envisioned a pristine tuxedo—a well-fitted white suit with a wingtip collared shirt, a shawl-collared vest, a sequinned white tie, sleek trousers, and the kind of presence that turns heads. I had it tailored. I spent good money. But when I wore it, it felt wrong. Lifeless. Not me.

So I returned to the drawing board, reimagining something oversized, flowing—a dreamy, dramatic white ensemble with a mid-thigh-length sequinned shirt, an open vest, and wide trousers. It was meant to be poetic, airy, and opulent. I didn’t find the silver shoes I wanted, so I settled on a bold red pair and for back-up (I loved the shoes!) a shiny gold one. But again, when I wore the outfit, something felt off. Not terrible, not hideous. Just not quite the vision I had carried in my heart.

And this is where it becomes difficult—fashioning dreams into reality when funds are limited. The cloth costs a bomb. Tailoring costs more. And there’s no going back once it’s stitched. Unlike prêt-à-porter, where you see, try, and buy, tailor-made clothes require you to visualise, communicate, and gamble.

Maybe I’m still learning how fabric falls. Maybe I struggle to translate vision into language for the tailor. But it breaks my heart when I fail to materialise what I imagined.

Still, I persevere. I don’t create to impress others. I dress for the mirror—for the moment when I look at myself and think, Yes. That’s the man I want to be. That’s the man I see in my mind’s eye.

It’s not about vanity. It’s about honouring the person I am, the artist within me, the child who once dreamed in magazine spreads. I want my 50th birthday to reflect who I’ve become. Not perfect. But honest. Eccentric. Elegant. Me.

And yes, perhaps people do laugh sometimes. Maybe they always will. But I’ve learnt—especially now, as I near 50—that their opinion isn’t the point. If I can look at myself and feel beautiful, powerful, present—then that’s enough. More than enough.

So back to the drawing board I go. One week to go. And this time, I trust I’ll get there.

Because at the heart of it, fashion—like life—isn’t about having it all. It’s about creating beauty with what you have, daring to imagine more, and showing up in the world as exactly who you are.

My Family’s Faith

In my family, religion has never been a matter of compulsion, inheritance, or rigid tradition. It has been a deeply personal and often private path—respected, explored, questioned, and above all, lived with empathy. We are a family not bound by sameness, but knitted together by love, resilience, and the shared grace of accepting each other as we are.

The generation before mine taught me this without ever having to explain it in so many words. My mother, a Parsi woman, met and fell in love with my father, a Sikh man. Their union was not seen kindly by many in her community, and she was shunned—albeit briefly—before her parents came around and welcomed her back. That moment of reconciliation, to me, holds more spiritual weight than any sermon could offer.

On my father’s side, every sibling followed their own truth, and none bowed to the pressures of uniformity. My eldest paternal aunt married a Maharashtrian Hindu man with four children. She chose not to have biological children of her own because she wished to raise his as hers. She did so with grace and devotion, speaking fluent Marathi, transforming his household into a space of warmth. He passed away just five years into their marriage, at a time when they were only beginning to build something tender and lasting.

My second paternal aunt married a Gujarati man with children from a previous marriage, and once again, she made the choice not to bear children, instead pouring her love into me and my sister. She was more of a father to us than our own, who fell into alcoholism not long after I was born.

My paternal uncle married an American Catholic woman—an intercultural and intercontinental union—though the marriage did not last. Yet she was known to all of us, accepted fully during the time she was part of our family.

On my mother’s side, the inter-faith marriage she entered into was a rarity. Her siblings all married within the Parsi fold. But then came the next generation: my cousin Natasha, the daughter of my maternal aunt, married a Malayali Catholic. No one raised an eyebrow. It was accepted as natural—as it should be.

My own sister married a Kashmiri Pandit. Other cousins married Catholics, Gujaratis, Hindus—no one seemed to view these marriages as transgressions. To us, they were unions of love, not religious negotiations.

As for me—I have loved a Hindu man. I have loved a Muslim man. I have loved a Danish Christian. And I am an atheist. The irony is not lost on me. But I don’t find contradiction here. I find cohesion. I do not reject belief systems—I observe, absorb, appreciate, and honour what others hold dear. In many ways, that is my faith: the sanctity of personal belief, whether present or absent.

Recently, I had a conversation with an acquaintance about this tapestry of interfaith relationships in my family. His response stunned me. He said something to the effect that such a thing would never be allowed in his family. And worse, he spoke with a tone of disdain—almost pity. For the first time in a long while, I was made to question whether what I had always considered a strength—this lived secularism, this openness—could be seen as a flaw.

It shook me. For a fleeting moment, I felt dislodged from my own certainty, my own probable pride in coming from a family that embraced diversity as if it were the most natural thing. But I recovered that sense quickly. Because what he dismissed is, in truth, what I hold dearest: a family that opens its doors wide, where beliefs may differ but love remains constant.

As a child, I was educated in a convent school. I learnt Catholic prayers. My paternal grandmother taught me Sikh prayers. My mother still prays every Friday—a habit I have inherited in spirit if not in ritual. From friends and relatives, I’ve picked up Hindu customs, observed Jain decorum, joined in Eid celebrations, decorated the tree each Christmas, danced in the colours of Holi, and set up Pooja rituals during Diwali. I celebrate Ganesh Chaturthi, Bhau Beej, Rakhi, Dussehra, and Navratri. Every festival that holds meaning for someone I love, holds meaning for me too.

As I see it, religion is not a divide. It is an offering—one that can be accepted with grace, even if not practiced. Love is the force that ties all these practices together. Belief is not a boundary but a bridge.

“All differences in this world are of degree, and not of kind, because oneness is the secret of everything.”

— Swami Vivekananda

My upbringing has taught me that India is not one story. It is a grand, complex novel—interwoven with hundreds of narratives, dialects, faiths, food traditions, music, prayers, and paths. It is not unity through sameness. It is unity through difference.

And for those who reject that difference, who turn away from the beauty of co-existence, I can only feel sadness. Because they are missing out—not just on festivals, or food, or languages—but on the rich, life-changing encounters that can shape a soul.

I may be an atheist, but I believe—deeply, fervently—in the sanctity of human connection. And perhaps that is the greatest faith of all.

Saturation

These days, I find myself utterly saturated with social media. The moment I pick up my phone, there’s a reflexive urge to open Instagram—to check who’s liked my pictures, to see who’s sent me a message. But what greets me more often than not is a reel. Just a forwarded reel. No greeting. No message. No real thought.

And within these reels, there could be something to say, of course. But no one seems to want to say it. Gone are the days when someone might send a poem, or a quote that made them think of you. Now, it’s all mindless content—videos that aren’t remotely funny, often accompanied by that insufferable, artificial background laughter I utterly abhor.

I suppose this is just the sign of our times.

So I’ve found myself pulling away. I don’t use my phone as much anymore. I go on social media only when necessary. I’ll put up a post now and then, perhaps out of a quiet desire to remain ‘relevant’—whatever that means—but even if I’m not, I’ve made my peace with that. I don’t fuss with hashtags anymore. I write what I feel, connect it to the photograph I’m sharing, and that’s that.

What keeps drawing me back, really, are the friends. The connections I’ve made on social media mean something. I remember how vibrant it felt during the lockdown—going live, making videos on TikTok, the spontaneity of it all. TikTok, in particular, had an algorithm that worked with you, not against you. It made the video-making process feel fluid and intuitive. Reels, in contrast, feels like a clumsy attempt to fill the vacuum left by TikTok’s ban in India. It simply doesn’t have the same finesse, and I often give up midway through making something.

These days, I browse through stories, maybe glance at my PS5 app. Occasionally, I stumble upon something brilliant on ChatGPT—some insight, some gem of knowledge. But it, too, is a paid service, and eventually, I run out of access for the day. I don’t even like reading on my phone anymore, though I do have a Kindle and a Books app with a few poetry anthologies. When I feel the pull, I’ll read a poem or two.

Phone calls never did appeal to me much. It’s strange to think that this sleek, beautiful device—once an extension of myself—is now being used less than ever. Two or three years ago, I would have been constantly on it. Now, not so much.

As for Twitter—yes, I’m calling it Twitter because X sounds like a porn channel. And let’s be honest, that’s what it’s become for many. I’ve nothing against porn, but Twitter has devolved into a space of relentless hate. It’s vituperative, caustic, and yes—toxic. I don’t use that word lightly, but it fits here.

I do have a Blue Sky account now. It’s a gentler place, kinder in tone. But truly, most of what I want to say these days, I say in my blog. I’ve begun consolidating my poetry, my art, my photography, and my prose—all in one space. And in doing so, I feel a sense of wholeness. A sense that I’m putting something meaningful out there.

Perhaps someone will read it. Perhaps they’ll resonate with it. Perhaps not.

But it’s mine. And it’s real.

I don’t know how many of you will agree with what I’ve said, but this is where I stand. This is how I feel these days.

And maybe you feel it too.